Legal Opinion

Mann v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

C. S., 6691, Michie’s, provides that “every person, before beginning to practice optometry in this State after the passage of this article, shall pass an examination before the board of examiners,” etc. The plaintiff from 1913 to 1931 discontinued the practice of optometry, engaged in other business, and failed and omitted to pay the fees required by law.

Did such conduct on his part amount to an abandonment of his license duly issued or of his right to reenter the profession without examination?

It has been generally held that mere lapse of time or other delay in asserting a claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harper v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. State Ex Rel. Committee on Grievances of the North Carolina State Bar Ass'n v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Raleigh, Charlotte & Southern Railway Co. v. McGuireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Den Ex Dem. of McRee v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
  5. Vineberg v. . DaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Disabarment of WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue v. . HinsdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Allen v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API