Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Martin

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided December 4, 1997No. 03-97-00113-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDD, Justice.

By application for writ of habeas corpus, appellant, Edie Dione Martin, sought the dismissal of a charge of forgery on the ground that she was not timely indicted. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 32.01 (West 1989). The writ issued and, after a hearing, relief was denied. We will affirm.

BACKGROUND

Article 32.01 provides:

When a defendant has been detained in custody or held to bail for his appearance to answer any criminal accusation before the district court, the prosecution, unless otherwise ordered by the court, for good cause shown, supported by affidavit, shall be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ex Parte Mallares, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Ex Parte Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Ex Parte Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Ex parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Ex parte ByramTexas Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API