Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided March 12, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Thomas V. Infantino City Attorney City of Inverness

QUESTION:

May the City of Inverness annex unincorporated property pursuant to the provisions of s. 171.044, F.S., without holding an approving referendum despite the fact that the city charter requires a referendum to be held whenever the city seeks to annex property?

SUMMARY:

The City of Inverness may annex unincorporated property only in accordance with the procedures provided in ch. 171, F.S., and may not require an ordinance annexing property and redefining the boundary lines of the city pursuant to the provisions of s.171.044, F.S.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. City of EdgewaterSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. NORTH RIDGE GEN. HOSPITAL, INC. v. City of Oakland ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Klich, Et Ux. v. Miami Land Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Smith v. AyresSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API