Legal Opinion
Stock v. Morizzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court, in its discretion, may grant permission to conduct additional discovery after the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness where the moving party demonstrates that “unusual or unanticipated circumstances” developed subsequent to the filing that require additional pretrial proceedings to prevent substantial prejudice (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; see Lopez v Retail Prop. Trust, 84 AD3d 891 [2011]; Wigand v Modlin, 82 AD3d 1213 [2011]; Owen v Lester, 79 AD3d 992 [2010]; Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135,140 [2000]). Here, more than two years after the filing of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Audiovox Corp. v. BenyaminiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Encarnacion v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Huggins v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Karakostas v. Avis Rent A Car SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Owen v. LesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cioffi v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- M.V.B. Collision, Inc. v. RovtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- M.V.B. Collision, Inc. v. RovtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012