Legal Opinion
Huggins v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*733The appellant’s motion insofar as it sought a further deposition of the plaintiff concerning questions objected to at his examination before trial was, in effect, an application seeking a ruling on an examination before trial, and an order made upon such an application is not appealable as of right (see, Cruz v Roman Catholic Church for Most Holy Trinity, 222 AD2d 395; Forte v Franklin Gen. Hosp., 185 AD2d 914). We decline to grant the appellant leave to appeal from that portion of the order which denied its request for an additional deposition of the plaintiff.
There is no restriction in CPLR…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. KalowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Korolyk v. BlagmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Forte v. Franklin General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cruz v. Roman Catholic Church for Most Holy TrinityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- D'Amico v. NuzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rinaldi v. Evenflo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Gelin v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Futersak v. BrinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Bermejo v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Schissler v. Brookdale Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.