Legal Opinion

United States v. Hills

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 8, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a motion to quash an indictment found by the grand jury accusing the defendant of a violation of section ii of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 (Act May 6, 1882, c. 126, 22 Stat. 61 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1307]), as amended in 1884 (Act July 5, 1884, c. 220, 23 Stat. 117 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1310]). That section prohibits a person from knowingly bringing into, or causing to be brought into, the United States by land any Chinese person not lawfully entitled to enter the United States; and from aiding or abetting such unlawful entry. It was admitted on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. The People v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Patterson v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Wadsworth v. . Sharpsteen and MoffatNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grant Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API