Legal Opinion

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Outlaw

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1951No. 4 Div. 150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

In the court below these two suits were by agreement tried jointly, the pleadings and the evidence being the same in each case. Separate verdicts and judgments were rendered in favor of each plaintiff. This appeal is from these judgments.

For convenience we will hereinafter treat the two cases as a single case, they being identical in every respect as to all propositions and issues.

The plaintiff sought damages resulting from injuries sustained when an automobile in which she was riding as a passenger ran into a flat car of a train while the same was across a highway in the town…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  3. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ridgeway v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Adair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Lambeth v. GULF, MOBILE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API