Legal Opinion

State v. Rodrigues.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2012No. SCWC-30692PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that the circuit court of the fifth circuit (the court) properly suppressed the evidence obtained by Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant State of Hawaii (Respondent) during the unlawful search of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Marco Rodrigues (Petitioner) because Respondent failed to “present clear and convincing evidence that [the] evidence obtained in violation of article I, section 7 [of the Hawaii Constitution], 1 would inevitably have been discovered by lawful means[,]” State v. Lopez, 78 Hawai'i 433, 451, 896 P.2d 889, 907 (1995). Hence the evidence was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oahu Publications Inc. v. Ahn.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Mastella L. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Mastella L. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API