Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mastella L. Jackson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2016No. 2014AP002238-CRPublished

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

¶ 93. (.dissenting). Unlike the majority opinion, I would suppress the physical evidence obtained at Mastella Jackson's home following law enforcement officers' deliberate violations of Jackson's Miranda rights.

¶ 94. The majority decides this Miranda case in the same month as the fiftieth anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (June 13, 1966).1 Miranda is perhaps the best-known criminal law decision of the United States Supreme Court.

¶ 95. The Miranda warnings are celebrated as a shield against compelled self-incrimination and violations of criminal suspects' constitutional rights. Mi*729…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API