State v. Mastella L. Jackson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
¶ 93. (.dissenting). Unlike the majority opinion, I would suppress the physical evidence obtained at Mastella Jackson's home following law enforcement officers' deliberate violations of Jackson's Miranda rights.
¶ 94. The majority decides this Miranda case in the same month as the fiftieth anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (June 13, 1966).1 Miranda is perhaps the best-known criminal law decision of the United States Supreme Court.
¶ 95. The Miranda warnings are celebrated as a shield against compelled self-incrimination and violations of criminal suspects' constitutional rights. Mi*729…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.