Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff,J.

The three propositions upon which the appellant predicates a reversal find their origin in the grounds set forth in his motion in arrest of judgment, and may be stated as follows: (1) That the information is indefinite, vague, and uncertain in the statement of the facts constituting the crime charged; (2) that the information was sworn to and filed by “a private individual,” in violation of the Constitution of Iowa; and (3) that the verdict was rendered by a jury of six, whereas, under the Constitution of Iowa, the defendant had a right to a jury of twelve persons. Of these in their order.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Zelle v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. State v. FortunskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BostwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. State v. PhippenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. City of Des Moines v. PughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. State v. BethardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API