Legal Opinion

People v. Mangum

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 18, 1975No. 26803PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

This is an interlocutory appeal initiated by the district attorney on behalf of the People, challenging the correctness of rulings by the trial court sustaining motions to suppress (1) physical evidence and (2) statements and admissions of defendant Frey. We reverse.

Defendants Mangum and Frey are jointly charged with second-degree burglary (section 18-4-203, C.R.S. 1973), theft (section 18-4-401, C.R.S. 1973) and two counts of conspiracy (section 18-2-201, C.R.S. 1973).

The motion to suppress, in brief, was based upon the lack of probable cause to arrest or to search and seize the physical…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Stone v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GopherMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. State v. WhittenbackUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. WaitsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API