Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1988No. C-870290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Hamilton County Municipal Court.

The defendant-appellant, Michael Meyer, stands convicted of disorderly conduct under R.C. 2917.11(A)(5), following a trial without the intervention of a jury in the municipal court. In this appeal, he seeks a discharge from the conviction, raising constitutional claims concerning the validity of the disorderly conduct statute in two of the three assignments of error given to us for review. We find it unnecessary to reach those claims, because, in our resolution of the remaining assignment, we determine that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hall China Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McClung v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cannon v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Cannon v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API