Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Ottawa Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1928No. Calendar 33,956PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Solely because of local rule 3 of the circuit court for the county of Ottawa, the defendant circuit judge declined to permit the plaintiff to proceed in an action in tort brought by him against the township of Jamestown because of his failure to give security for costs. The rule reads as follows:

“When the plaintiff in any ease, after being required by order of the court to give security for costs, and when such security shall be required by statute, shall file an affidavit to the effect that he has a good and meritorious cause of action, but is unable to procure security for costs and desires…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Saylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Plummer v. GideonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. State ex rel. Tooreau v. PoseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Paley v. Coca Cola CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API