Legal Opinion

Kizer v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2011No. 10-5161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.

Following their termination from appointed positions within the Shelby County Clerk’s Office, Edward A. Kizer, John J. Ryan, III, and Don Howell brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They allege that they were terminated without due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the County and its officials, concluding that Kizer, Ryan, and Howell received constitutionally adequate process prior to their termination. On appeal, the three former employees challenge that conclusion. We agree…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Garretson v. City of Madison HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Christophel v. KukulinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Averitt v. CloonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cromer v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. Edwards v. Shelby County, TennesseeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
  3. Hamblin v. Wilson County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
  4. Murray v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Nichols v. DwyerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API