Legal Opinion
San Diegans for the Mt. Soledad National War Memorial v. Paulson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 7, 2006No. 05A1233PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Kennedy,
Circuit Justice.
In this longrunning federal-court litigation the United States District Court for the Southern District of California has ordered that, within 90 days of May 3, 2006, the city of San Diego, California, must comply with an earlier injunction, affirmed on appeal, that barred the city from maintaining a prominent Latin cross at a veterans’ memorial on city property. The premise of the injunction was that the cross’ permanent presence there violates the California State Constitution. See Murphy v. Bilbray, 782 F. Supp. 1420, 1426-1427, 1438 (SD Cal. 1991), aff'd,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Legalization Assistance Project of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor No. A-426Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Murphy v. BilbrayDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1991
- Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Redbud Hospital DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trunk v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mount Soledad Memorial Assn. v. TrunkSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Strange v. SearcySupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Ex parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Jewish War Veterans of the Uni v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.