State v. Brune
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,720 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ALEX W. BRUNE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT It is generally within a sentencing judge's discretion to determine whether a sentence should run concurrent with or consecutive to another sentence. Appeal from Johnson District Court; SARA WELCH, judge. Opinion filed February 2, 2018. Affirmed. Peter Maharry, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, was on the brief for appellant. Jacob M. Gontesky, assistant district attorney, Stephen M. Howe, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. MosherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015