Legal Opinion

Neice v. Prosper Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 5, 2024No. A184437Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 631 September 5, 2024 735 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Joan NEICE and Michael Galizio, Petitioners, v. PROSPER PORTLAND and City of Portland, Respondents. Land Use Board of Appeals 2023091; A184437 Submitted July 16, 2024. Ross Day and Day Law, P.C., filed the brief for petitioners. Linly Rees filed the brief for respondents. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, Powers, Judge, and Hellman, Judge. ORTEGA, P. J. Affirmed. 736 Neice v. Prosper Portland ORTEGA, P. J. Petitioners seek judicial review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) granting the City of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Billington v. Polk CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Manchester Solar, LLC v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Neice v. Prosper PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API