Legal Opinion
Opinion No. Oag 71-80, (1980)
Wisconsin Attorney General Reports
Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Lowell B. JACKSON, Secretary Department of Transportation
You have asked for my opinion on this question:
What is sufficient occupancy of a business operation to make an owner eligible for a business replacement payment under [the Wisconsin Relocation Act] s. 32.19(4)(a)(intro.), Stats. [as affected by chs. 221 and 358, Laws of 1979]?
Section 32.19(4m)(a)(intro.), Stats., as amended effective July 17, 1980, reads in pertinent part:
In addition to amounts otherwise authorized by this chapter, the condemnor shall make a payment, not to exceed $50,000 to any owner displaced person who has owned and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Aero Auto Parts, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Holcomb v. SzymczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Redevelopment Authority v. StepanikCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Racine v. BassingerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991