Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Endsley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1910No. 2076PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Sixth District, in an appeal from Bowie County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

The Texas & Pacific Bailway Company owned and operated a track in the city of Texarkana, which crossed the track of the Cotton Belt Bailroad at a certain point in the city. The Texas & Pacific track runs on a curve for some distance before and after crossing the Cotton Belt Bailroad. By the side of and near to the track of the Texas & Pacific Bailroad was a beaten plain path made by pedestrians who had walked there for considerable time, in fact without any interference or molestation on the part of the railroad, and it is not denied by the plaintiff is error that Endsley was a licensee upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. KizziahTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Hawthorne v. Texas & N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Gammage v. Gamer Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Roberts v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API