Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Kizziah

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1893No. 34PublishedCited by 23 opinions

3. Findings of Fact by Court of Civil Appeals. The findings of fact made by the Court of Civil Appeals can not be revised on writ of error by Supreme Court........................... 87 Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from Johnson County.

1Opinion of the Court

BBOWN, Associate Justice.

The appellee sued the appellant in the District Court of Johnson County, to recover of it damages for injuries alleged to have been received by him while in its employ at Cleburne, in that county. The petition alleges, in substance, that appellee was employed by the examiner and repairer of cars at said station, and that it was the duty of appellee and one Benfro to make such repairs upon cars, when needed, as could be made without sending them to the round house. That on the 2nd day of November, 1888, a train of cars came into Cleburne on the appellant’s road,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  2. Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CallbreathTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Texas M. R. Co. v. WhitmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Lee v. YandellTexas Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TempletonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. EndsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API