Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

King v. Olmsted

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 29, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01295Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MARVELL KING, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-C-1295 STEPHANIE OLMSTED, et al., Defendants. SCREENING ORDER Plaintiff Marvell King, an inmate confined at the Green Bay Correctional Institution, filed a pro se complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights. This order resolves plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and screens his complaint. I. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING THE FILING FEE The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) applies to this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API