Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Ladd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill sought partition ór sale for division of lands among the cotenants as joint owners.

It is alleged that one Taylor took title in his own name to the land in question, purchased with the wife’s money, she being under the disability of the married woman’s ' law; that due to a mistake of the scrivener the words, “as- trustee,” were omitted from the granting clause of the deed; that the only interest therein of the .named grantee was • that as trustee for tlie wife, whose money had been invested therein as the full amount of the purchase price. It is further alleged that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Fowler v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Ruckman v. CorySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Wood v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Alexander v. SaulsburySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ammons v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Thompson v. SuttleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API