Legal Opinion

Gerard Construction Co. v. City of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 11, 1980No. 80-224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before us is whether a municipality may lawfully consider differences in proposed completion times in determining the lowest responsible bidder when the project specifications fail to clearly indicate either a completion date or that the length of construction time would be a determining factor in awarding the contract. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, a difference in proposed construction time is not an appropriate factor for consideration in determining the lowest responsible bidder.

This case arises from the following circumstances. On February 14, 1980, the City…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Housing Authority of the City of Opelousas, Louisiana v. Pittman Construction Company, Inc., and Pittman Construction Company, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Opelousas, Louisiana and George G. Marquette, Jr., D/B/A Marco Construction Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Platt Electric Supply, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Duffy v. Village of PrincetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. State Employees' Ass'n v. Board of Trustees of the UniversitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marbucco Corp. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Irwin Marine, Inc. v. Blizzard, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Page v. Reorganized School District R-VI of Christian CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Kenneth E. Curran, Inc. v. Auclair Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API