Legal Opinion

Hill v. Leschber

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1950No. 9913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

Carl Leschber, appellee, sued C. F. Hill and Arnel Bielss to recover $296.42, alleged to he the unpaid purchase price of 8,300 pounds of corn which he sold and delivered to Hill and Bielss.

Hill, alone, answered. He filed several defensive pleas but did not plead that he had paid for the corn.

Trial was before a jury. Appellee moved for judgment against both defendants upon the jury’s verdict. This motion was granted. Hill, only, has appealed and the record does not contain a statement of facts.

Appellant seeks a reversal and rendition because, as he says, “Appellee having…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RR. Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Weeks v. HeinrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. M. C. Winters, Inc. v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Hill v. LeschberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API