Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 10, 2017No. 01-16-00755-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Lloyd, Justice *503Appellant Nelson Alberto Hernandez was charged by information with assault-family member. After a jury found appellant guilty of the charged offense, the trial court assessed his punishment at 180 days in county jail. In three points of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) admitting the 911 call in violation of the Confrontation Clause; (2) labeling the offense for which appellant was convicted as "assault-family member" rather than "assault"; and (3) assessing a $25 "district attorney" fee in the bill of cost. We modify the trial court's judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Daniel Bartolo Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
  2. Derrick Davenport v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Hernandez, Nelson AlbertoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020
  5. Jason Arthur Duchesneau v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API