Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hernandez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 10, 2017No. 01-16-00755-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Keyes

OPINION DISSENTING FROM DENIAL OF REHEARING

Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the panel majority's denial of rehearing. I agree with the State's argument in its Motion for Rehearing that we erred in holding unconstitutional Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 102.008(a), which, upon conviction, provides for the assessment of a $25 fee "for the trying of [a misdemeanor] case by the district or county attorney." See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN . art. 102.008(a) (West 2018). I would hold that the trial court did not err in including the fee in the bill of cost assessed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Yazdchi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Peraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Salinas, OrlandoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API