Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Pettie
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 4, 1982No. 61256PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
424 So.2d 734 (1982)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Bernard Paul PETTIE, Jr., Respondent.
No. 61256.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 4, 1982.
Rehearing Denied January 24, 1983.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David G. McGunegle, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for The Florida Bar, complainant.
Robert E. Morris of Morris & Rosen, Tampa, for respondent.
2Per curiam
This attorney-discipline proceeding is before the Court on the complaint of The Florida Bar. We have before us the report of a referee and respondent's petition for review thereof. This cause is…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Polk v. State Bar of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
- The Florida Bar v. PincketSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- The Florida Bar v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Florida Bar v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
4Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- In re the Discipline of Two AttorneysMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- The Florida Bar v. PavlickSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- The Florida Bar v. MarksSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.