Legal Opinion

Wyno v. Lowndes Cnty.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 18, 2019No. S18A1231PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bethel, Justice.

In this case, Jason Wyno challenges the constitutionality of former OCGA § 4-8-30, a portion of the Responsible Dog Ownership Law which purports to exempt local governments and their employees from liability arising from their enforcement of, or failure to enforce, that law and local dog-control ordinances. Wyno argues that this statute impermissibly extends the official immunity of local government employees provided in Article I, Section II, Paragraph IX (d) of the Georgia Constitution of 1983 ("Paragraph IX (d)") because former OCGA § 4-8-30 is not "a State Tort Claims Act."

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Murphy v. BajjaniSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Merrow v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Adams v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Lathrop v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Charles Johnson, Jr. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  2. WILLIAMS v. DEKALB COUNTYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. MENDEZ v. MOATSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  4. ASHLEY WILSON v. CHRISTINE ANDERSONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
  5. Caroline Croland v. Stephenson CamilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API