Legal Opinion

MENDEZ v. MOATS

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 28, 2020No. S19G1095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

310 Ga. 114

FINAL COPY S19G1095. MENDEZ v. MOATS et al. Order. After careful consideration of the full record and the briefs of the parties, the Court has determined that the writ of certiorari issued in Case No. S19G1095 was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the writ is vacated, and the petition for certiorari in Case No. S19C1095 is denied. All the Justices concur, except Melton, C. J., who dissents, and McMillian, J., disqualified. NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice, concurring. Our Court granted a writ of certiorari in this case to address two important questions presented by the divided opinion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Hennessy v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Lathrop v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Donaldson v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  5. Roberts v. BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. OCONEE COUNTY v. CANNONSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  2. COLLINGTON v. CLAYTON COUNTYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  3. Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  4. COLLINGTON v. CLAYTON COUNTYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  5. McIntosh County v. Marc NoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API