Legal Opinion

Pinkus v. Reilly

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 248-59Published

1Opinion of the Court

HARTSHORNE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Joseph J. Pinkus, trading as Spot Reducer Co., Spot Reducer Company, etc., here seeks to enjoin defendant, Louis A. Reilly, as Postmaster of the City of Newark, New Jersey, from enforcing a “fraud order” issued against the plaintiff by the Post Office Department, after a lengthy administrative hearing. Substantially this proceeding is for a judicial review of the administrative determination upon the basis of the lengthy certified record before the Post Office Department. The ultimate legal question before this Court is whether this record supports the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers, Locals Nos. 15, 17, 107, 108 & 111 v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API