Legal Opinion

Crone v. Occident Elevator Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1924No. 5,383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

Claiming that under the terms of the contract hereafter referred to she was the owner of and entitled to the proceeds of aT the grain grown during the year 1921 upon the land therein described, plaintiff brought this action to recover the same from the defendants, who were in possession thereof, according to her allegations. The case was tried without a jury, and at the close of the testimony the court found the issues for the defendants and a judgment of dismissal was entered, from which the plaintiff has appealed.

Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant made a request for findings of fact…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Angell v. EggerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Merrill v. ResslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. First National Bank v. MarloweMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Putt v. EDWARDS EQUIPMENT COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API