Legal Opinion

Hansrote v. Amer Industrial Technologies Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-218PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEITELBAUM, Chief Judge.

In the trial of this diversity action plaintiff George Hansrote claimed the termination of his employment relationship by defendant Amer Industrial Technologies, Inc. (Amer) breached his contract of employment for a specific number of years or a reasonable period of time and was in violation of public policy and therefore a wrongful discharge. The jury returned a verdict for Hansrote and Amer moves for judgment n.o.v.

Moving for judgment n.o.v., Amer assumes the parties entered into a contract of employment. Addressing Hansrote’s breach of contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Gillian v. Consolidated Foods Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Rubin v. Lustro Tile Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Braun v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Birrane v. Master Collectors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  3. Brown v. HammondDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Gordon v. Tenneco Retail Service Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1987
  5. Hansrote v. Amer Indus. Technologies, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API