Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Walz
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 12, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas
Affirming.
The appellant and plaintiff below, F. F. Reynolds, is a practicing dentist located in Louisville, Kentucky. Our General Assembly at its regular 1938 session enacted chapter 148, page 722, of the session acts for that year, and which is now Section 2636-1 et seq. of the April, 1939, Supplement to Baldwin’s 1936 Revision of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes. The 1938 Act repealed, amended and re-enacted prior statutes relating to and regulating the practice of dentistry in this Commonwealth and it will hereafter be referred to as “the amendment.” Section 7…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shelton v. McCarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- University of Kentucky v. BunnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
- Lewis v. Kentucky State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
- Daniel Cameron, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Emw Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C., on Behalf of Itself, Its Staff and Its PatientsKentucky Supreme Court · 2023