Legal Opinion

City of McDonough v. Tusk Partners

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1997No. S97A1175PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Tusk Partners, a Georgia .general partnership, filed an applica*694tion with the City of McDonough to rezone 19.28 acres of land it contends is in the City of McDonough. Tusk first sought to have the land zoned from R-200 (single family residential) to C-3 (highway commercial); the city planning staff and an expert land use planner recommended the application be denied, but that the property be rezoned to R-100 (still residential but with smaller lot sizes thereby allowing higher density development than R-200). Tusk then filed a second application, seeking a divided rezoning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. City of Atlanta v. McLennanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. DeKalb County v. Albritton PropertiesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waldeck v. Curtis 1000, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Cox Interior, Inc. v. Bayland Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Augusta Eye Center, P.C. v. DuplessieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. City of Atlanta v. TAP Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API