HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INC
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE LAWRENCE HIGGINS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 1:21-cv-00369-NT ) HUHTAMAKI, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Before me are two motions by the Defendants to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). For the reasons stated below, the motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This case arises out of the alleged discharge, distribution, disposal, and spreading of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and their constituents (collectively, “PFAS”) by paper mills owned and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- A.G. Ex Rel. Maddox v. Elsevier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.