Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1989No. 80146, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.

We granted leave to appeal limited to the issue whether People v Tanner, 387 Mich 683; 199 NW2d 202 (1972), which held that where an indeterminate sentence is required by statute, the minimum sentence imposed may not exceed two-thirds of the maximum sentence, applies to sentencing imposed on a person convicted as an habitual offender.

We hold that any sentence for a term of years imposed pursuant to § 10 of the habitual offender *86act, MCL 769.10; MSA 28.1082,1 is subject to the rule that the minimum term of years may not exceed two-thirds of the maximum term of years. Accordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Estate of MoukalledMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Martha Cares Olsen v. Chikaming TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Kowalski v. FiutowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. D'Agostini Land Company LLC v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API