Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiStefano

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 22, 1986PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Upon motions by the defendants, a judge of the Superior Court ordered the suppression of evidence seized during a search of the defendants’ home at 25 East Elm Street, Everett. The Commonwealth applied to a single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court for leave to take an interlocutory appeal under Mass.R.Crim.P. 15(b)(2), 378 Mass. 884 (1979). The single justice granted the application and ordered that the case be heard by a panel of this court.

We review the adequacy of the affidavit made by a State police officer in support of the search warrant under which the police acted.

1. Probable…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. SpanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. GrimshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API