State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Northwestern National Insurance Company (Northwestern). State Farm contends that the trial court erred in ruling that State Farm did not have a valid equitable subrogation claim against Northwestern for settlement monies State Farm paid after investigating an accident which it claims should have been primarily covered by a Northwestern policy. We reverse.
Because we are reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we “view the facts and all reasonable inferences…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Bakowski v. Mountain States Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.