State v. Jamail
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
The State and County took all of one tract belonging to appellees, and part of another, for highway purposes in this eminent domain proceeding. Judgment for damages was rendered on a jury verdict.
By their first five points appellants contend the landowners abandoned their objections to the award of commissioners by waiting more than three years and nine months to have citation issued in the County Court, and their rights are barred by limitation. They point to Denton Comity v. Brammer (Tex.Sup.1962), 361 S.W.2d 198 as supporting their position.
In the present case the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Denton County v. BrammerTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- J. Weingarten, Inc. v. BrockmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. BiggersTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- McElyea v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ahlschlager v. Remington Arms Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- State v. ReehCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Sanders v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- State v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Rumbaut v. LabagnaraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990