Legal Opinion
Wahl v. Foreman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1975No. 74 Civ. 5746PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge:
Defendant Percy Foreman moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of in per-sonam jurisdiction, for improper venue, or alternatively, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. He further requests, should the motion to dismiss be denied, that the action be transferred to the Southern District of Texas on the ground of forum non con-veniens.
Plaintiff Eugene A. Wahl, a citizen of New Jersey, is the owner of Letters Patent No. 3,173,583 [the “Wahl Patent”]. Plaintiff Vibra Screw, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey, and with its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Liquid Carriers Corporation v. American Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- John J. Galgay, as Trustee in the Reorganization of R. Hoe & Co., Inc. v. Bulletin Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lieb v. American Pacific International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Aguero v. ChristopherDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
- Moyglare Stud Farm, Ltd. v. Due Process Stable, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Schreiber v. BlankfortDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Bernie v. Waterfront Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.