Legal Opinion

Costello v. Rice

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1959No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Jones,

This case, like Butcher et al. v. Rice, ante p. 158, questions the constitutionality of the Apportionment Act of May 10, 1921, P. L. 449, as amended by the Act of July 26, 1923, P. L. 106, and, by like token, the preceding Apportionment Acts of 1906 and 1874. The matter is before us on original jurisdiction. After the pleadings had been completed in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County (where the suit was properly instituted) and nothing remained for decision but questions of law, counsel for the plaintiff petitioned us to certiorari the record below…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Fergus v. MarksIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Appeal of HartranftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  5. Butcher v. RiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Zeigenfuse v. BoltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Costello v. RiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API