Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Corbett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1965No. 198PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShahp, J.

This appeal involves only the question of nonsuit. We may concede, as defendant tacitly does, that plaintiffs offered sufficient evidence of his negligence to repel the motion. Thus the inquiry is confined to this question: Does the evidence establish as a matter of law that negligence on the part of Mrs. Burnett was a proximate cause of her personal injuries and of Mr. Burnett’s property damage? Clontz v. Krimminger, 253 N.C. 252, 116 S.E. 2d 804. Defendant contends, in accordance with his plea of contributory negligence, that plaintiffs’ evidence discloses (1) that Mrs. Burnett, operating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Clontz v. KrimmingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Crotts v. Overnite Transportation CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Black v. Gurley Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beanblossom v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Ratliff v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Champion v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Scher v. AntonucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API