State v. Holland
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.
The State of Tennessee through D. W. Moulton, its Commissioner of Highways, filed the bill in this case to enjoin on equitable grounds an action at law instituted by defendant J. R. Coffman against City of Dayton to recover mortgage indebtedness due him on land previously condemned and appropriated for state highway purposes within the City of Dayton. The bill also named as defendants the mortgagors, H. B. Holland and wife. The State also filed a supplemental bill naming as a defendant Mr. 0. W. McKenzie who acted as counsel for Holland and wife in the original condemnation suit and later was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Humphreys v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- City of Chicago v. SalingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Central Bus Lines, Inc. v. Hamilton Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
- Covert v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Patterson v. Anderson Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castleman Construction Company v. PenningtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Edmondson v. Bradford-White Corp. (In Re Tinnell Traffic Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
- Catlett v. ChineryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Hon v. VarnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962