Legal Opinion · Concurrence

German Auto Parts, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. 20-90; CA A68306Published

1Concurrence

DURHAM, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the majority’s holding that the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) committed no error in declining to deduct unemployment benefits from the back pay portion of its remedial order. I write separately, because I do not accept the majority’s rationale.

I would rely solely on Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc., 305 Or 362, 752 P2d 291 (1988), to sustain BOLI’s order. Seibel refused to allow a private employer an offset of Social Security disability benefits from damages in a breach of employment contract action.

Petitioner here seeks to offset unemployment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Filter v. City of VernoniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API