Foley v. Verizon
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] Christine R. Foley appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Collier, HO), reducing Kevin B. Foley’s benefits. The basis for the reduction is the coordination of benefits provision, 39-A M.R.S. § 221 (2006), and the receipt of a lump-sum pension benefit. Foley contends that the hearing officer erred in treating the lump-sum pension benefit as though it were being received in weekly installments. Foley also argues that the hearing officer erred in finding that Verizon did not violate the “fourteen-day rule,” Me. W.C.B. Rule, ch. 1, § 1. Foley…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Ricci v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
3Cited by8 opinions
- GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. ZornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands InternationalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Baker v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Fay E. Johnson v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Geary v. Stanley Medical Research InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.