Legal Opinion

Foley v. Verizon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 11, 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] Christine R. Foley appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Collier, HO), reducing Kevin B. Foley’s benefits. The basis for the reduction is the coordination of benefits provision, 39-A M.R.S. § 221 (2006), and the receipt of a lump-sum pension benefit. Foley contends that the hearing officer erred in treating the lump-sum pension benefit as though it were being received in weekly installments. Foley also argues that the hearing officer erred in finding that Verizon did not violate the “fourteen-day rule,” Me. W.C.B. Rule, ch. 1, § 1. Foley…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Ricci v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. ZornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands InternationalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. Baker v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Fay E. Johnson v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. Geary v. Stanley Medical Research InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API