Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lugosi v. Universal Pictures

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1979No. L.A. 30824Published

1ConcurrenceMosk, J.

With the majority of my colleagues I concur in the judgment, and in the opinion of Presiding Justice Roth. Because this is a matter of first impression in our court, I am impelled to add some observations.

Factually and legally this is a remarkable case. Factually: not unlike the horror films that brought him fame, Bela Lugosi rises from the grave 20 years after death to haunt his former employer. Legally: his vehicle is a strained adaptation of a common law cause of action heretofore unknown either in a statute or case law in California.

The plaintiffs, and my dissenting colleagues,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Goldstein v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Uhlaender v. HenricksenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
  5. Price v. Hal Roach Studios, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API