Legal Opinion
M r . & M r s . S. v. Timberlane School
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 15, 2004No. CV-03-260-JDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
M r . & M r s . S . v . Timberlane School CV-03-260-JD 03/15/04 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE M r . and M r s . S . v. Civil N o . 03-260-JD Opinion N o .
2004 DNH 046
Timberlane Regional School District O R D E R M r . and M r s . S . seek attorneys’ fees under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B), asserting that they were the prevailing parties in the administrative due process proceeding brought by the Timberlane Regional School District (“District”). In support of their claim, M r . and M r s . S . have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fulson v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- John J. Kinney, Jr. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Voravongsa v. WallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Loguidice v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor v. Simpson, Gumpertz & Heger, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frost et al v. Town of Hampton et alDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Saalfrank v. Town of Alton, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010