Legal Opinion
Ciccone v. WATERFRONT COMM'N OF NEW YORK HARBOR
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum.
The judgment, of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with- costs, the determination of the Waterfront Commission, reinstated, and the petitions dismissed.
There was substantial evidence before the commission, considering both the evidentiary facts stipulated and the factual inferences reasonably to be drawn from them, to support the determination (cf. Matter of Police Benevolent Assn. of City of Yonkers v New York State Public Employment Relations Bd., 51 NY2d 779).
In this case 1 the commission was entitled to draw reasonable inferences both from the testimony of the parties…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Police Benevolent Ass'n of the City of Yonkers, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amber Rock Pharmacy, Inc. v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- American Diagnostic Laboratories, Inc. v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Cancio v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Homenick v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Thompkins v. Waterfront CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981