Legal Opinion

United States v. Ariel Terry-Crespo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2004No. 03-30085PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYBEE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Ariel Terry-Crespo appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence and statements. He alleges that reasonable suspicion did not support the police’s investigatory stop, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and that the evidence obtained was the suppressible, poisonous fruit of a search conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court found that the 911 telephone call precipitating the stop had sufficient indicia of reliability to provide the police with reasonable articulable suspicion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Vamond Elmore, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Andre WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Robinson v. HowesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Ernest Foster, Sr. v. Jeremy HellawellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API