Legal Opinion

United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Vamond Elmore, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 2007No. Docket 05-1734-cr(L), 05-6477-cr (XAP)PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAND, District Judge: *

The government appeals from the district court’s (Hall, J.) ruling that a tip from an informant was insufficiently corroborated to provide reasonable suspicion to stop defendant Vamond Elmore’s car. The government argues that the district court incorrectly categorized the informant as anonymous and therefore required too high a level of corroboration. Defendant cross-appeals from the district court’s ruling that evidence found pursuant to a search warrant issued based on the fruits of the stop should not be excluded under the good faith exception to the warrant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Cooper v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. United States v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API